the textual siege.

this may or may not be a a rhetorical question :

person A, has a job which pays rather well but robs her of any social and personal time as well as presenting no opportunity for growth.

person B, has a job which pays less than A's job but presents growth as well as time, with humanly hours as well. however she has [i think] got it much worse in the office politics department than A.

question is, who has got the shorter end of the stick? woof.

i've been thinking a lot... about nothing at all.

anyway person B, remember to regale us with tales of flailing fags and flagrant fabulosity while we're hunched over dimsum and hope you have fun!